Good day to you,

TITSSN will be moving most of its online web infrastructure presence into our social network starting immediately to enhance the resources, values and benefits that we have been providing there. We have 24 groups on LinkedIn of which we will move the secondary ones to our network and leave the primary to maintain presence there. We will preserve our presence on Facebook, MySpace, Yahoo and other web service provider sites with references to our network.

We are very excited about our new network and will be working to take full advantage of it immediately so that the benefits of education and awareness son/about technology and IT Security can be available for all.

More details to come so please check in on our social network and we look forward to your support.

Thank you and have a great day,

~Brett A. Scudder~

President/CEO

Facebook costs Swiss woman her job

Mon Apr 27, 2009 9:07am EDT | http://www.reuters.com/article/internetNews/idUSTRE53N4JF20090427

ZURICH (Reuters) – A Swiss insurance worker lost her job after surfing popular social network site Facebook while off sick, her employer said on Friday.

The woman said she could not work in front of a computer as she needed to lie in the dark but was then seen to be active on Facebook, which insurer Nationale Suisse said in a statement had destroyed its trust in the employee.

“This abuse of trust, rather than the activity on Facebook, led to the ending of the work contract,” it said.

The unnamed woman told the 20 Minuten daily she had been surfing Facebook in bed on her iPhone and accused her employer of spying on her and other employees by sending a mysterious friend request which allows access to personal online activity.

Nationale Suisse rejected the accusation of spying and said the employee’s Facebook activity had been stumbled across by a colleague in November, before use of the social network site was blocked in the company.

(Reporting by Emma Thomasson, editing by Paul Casciato)

© Thomson Reuters 2009 All rights reserved

Good day to you,

I would like to take this opportunity to share some very critical information with the self employed and home based business owners about the state of The IT Security Threats Landscape ~TITSTL~ and how it affects you. This is a discussion I have every day as more and more people in these categories are finding out the real effects and impacts of these threats are not excluding them and that they fall very much into the mix of it. As the economy tightens its grip on our lives, those who are being laid off are turning to home based and self employed business thus sparking an increased growth in this area of business. The SMB space has grown tremendously since his recession and to that end has become a serious security issue for us security professionals as we look across the IT Security Threats Landscape horizon.

Therefore, the reality of the issue must be faced thus bringing the question of, what am I to do about it.

I have published numerous articles on these threats, preventative measures and how to deal with the security issues of today and tomorrow on my blogs but I am going to do this as a summary of those here.

First let me say this, if it requires a security patch (let’s just keep it at security for now), it is vulnerable.

What does this mean?

Simple, any operating system, Microsoft, Mac, Linux, Solaris, you name it, that requires a security patch for any reason is vulnerable. The patch is to prevent exploit of the vulnerability right so it is a security risk.

I had to get that out of the way so that we wouldn’t get into the ridiculous argument of which is more secure than the other. The way I see it is simply that, if a door is left open for anyone to come through it, the length of time left open versus the threat that comes through it is just as critical. So, any open door is a threat no matter where. What comes through it may differentiate the severity. They all have their insecurities at some point but how the vendor/developer addresses it lessens the impact and wide scale visibility of the issue. While some may announce these vulnerabilities and findings, other may patch/update them behind the scenes thus limiting the visibility and knowledge of the user.

Second, anti-virus alone is NOT going to protect you from the threats of today. It takes a multi-layered approach and as such, the various layers of protection must be enforced. So telling yourself that you have anti-virus protection on your PC is being as naïve as saying the threats doesn’t affect me and i’m not worried about them. While it is true that most anti-virus vendors are bundling multiple threat protection/prevention layers into their solutions, the proper configuration becomes the caveat to that solution. While many deploy with an out of the box config, there will be tweaks needed to customize it to your environment and needs. So one must understand what is being deployed and if it will provide the layers of protection needed.

So why is IT Security so serious for me as a self employed or home based business?

Well, ask yourself these questions,

What is it that you do and how do you do it?

Do you use email?

Do you send emails to customers/clients/partners/associates/potential clients?

Do you leverage the powers of social networking/media (Twitter, LinkedIn, MySpace, Facebook, Ning and the list goes on) today?

Do you use IM for personal and/or business use?

Do you browse the internet for data/information on whatever you’re working on or researching?

Do you do online banking or shopping?

Do you download multimedia contents from the web (music, movies, flash videos, etc)?

Do you download online presentations (PDF, PowerPoint)?

Did you know that PDF files presented one of the biggest security risks over the past 2 years but is the most widely distributed online document format?

Do you have a printer or some media player connected to you system(s) at home or in the office?

Do you have any applications running on that system aside from the operating system?

Do you know of the Breach Notification Law in your state and what it means for you?

When was the last time you downloaded a keygens or crack file to open full access to that app or game you really wanted but didn’t want to buy/pay for?

Maybe you didn’t crack/keygen it but someone did and opened a backdoor which planed a rootkit or some nefarious threats on your system(s). What happens when you use that for business purposes, what are you spreading to those you collaborate with?

Well by now i’m sure you’ve caught my drift and I don’t have to get technical for you to see how you’re affected. All these questions pose security risks in various ways and are able to be stopped, prevented and protected if the proper education, awareness and measures are put in place. Don’t ask if you’re affected or if I should be taking these things seriously, you must. You are as much a risk to me as I am to you if the proper steps are not implemented to secure your system and the data/information you have sitting on it about me, you and those you collaborate with.

That system is being used for personal and business use and at some point the access to/from or by a threat is heightened because of the lack of separation of the two. A system that is used by everyone in the home should not be the same used for doing your business. When someone in the home decides to crack that app and opens that backdoor, you’ll never know what can come through it and what your risk factor will be or are. Separate the two, business is business and personal is personal. The cost of a system today is much more affordable than a few years ago so it shouldn’t be a problem to get an extra one.

You are not a small business because you have 5 people working for you. You are not a small business because you only have 5 computers in your office or where you decide to conduct your business. To me as a security professional you are not a small business (home based or in an office) when you have records/information and access to 5000 people. A doctor who has an office with 5 employees and 8 systems managing 4000 patients’ info is not a small business in my eyes. If you’re a consultant running your own business and you manage systems or information for your clients you’re now there biggest risk because it’s your responsibility to control that. Every PC must be secured whether it is connected online or not as you never know if/when it will cross the line. This is how I see security.

When you decide to start doing business today you must consider the role you play with those in which you will be doing business and the kinds of interaction you will have with them. When sending an email from an infected system (whether you did or the resident worm) it is still coming from you and the possible effect on the recipient(s) can be adverse which may lead to legal issues.

When using social network can enhance your presence and what you do significantly, it is also an area of heightened risk both personally and professionally. Know the need and use it accordingly. Social networks are the future of collaboration but one must decide why the need and create the separation. If it’s for personal use one should always remember the impact on themselves as they are now putting themselves out there to the world. If for business, one should decide on how they want to be seen and what they would like the world to know about them and what they do. Social networking is a great thing to have and use, it’s the management and control of that presence that matters. The threats people face on social networks are the same they would face outside of it but just through a different medium. Educate yourself on these things and you will be ok.

As for the Breach Notification Law, most people didn’t even know of such laws about digital contents and its security. I strongly suggest you take a look at the law of your state and understand the legal and financial issues it presents for you. Learn it, know it, and understand it. If in doubt, reach out.

The active Conficker worm should be enough of an eye opener for you and if you don’t know what it is then you may have bigger problems that I thought. Security is not just about you, it’s about your way of life today both on and offline. I am not here to scare you but it is better to know before than after as the damage control, legal and financial issues after the fact is much worse and a very daunting issue.

As for the online scams, phishing and SPAM, it is only going to get worse and until you educate and make yourself more aware of and about them, you may fall victim to them as they are craftier than ever.

Ok so I have chatted enough and now you’re saying this is too much so I will leave a few articles of reference.  Feel free to contact me if you’d like to discuss further and in more details.

The Conficker Worm – my review

A grim day for browser security at hacker contest

State Security Breach Notification Laws as of December 16, 2008 and the Conficker worm

IT Security Education and Awareness 04-09 #1 – IT Security is a people problem, not an industry one

Apple Mac users warned of web-based malware threats RSPlug-F Mac Trojan horse distributed via HDTV website

TITSSN leverages the Twitter network for critical alerting, notification and network happenings (meetings and events) as of April 1st 2009

Security/Privacy Awareness 03-09 #1 – Do you understand the breach notification law is in your country/state, do you know what it means, all are affected.

Thank you and have a great day,

~Brett A. Scudder~

The IT Security Attaché

Home Office minister Vernon Coaker has said the government is considering recording the traffic data of all UK citizens on social-networking sites, including Facebook, MySpace and Bebo

The UK government is considering the mass surveillance and retention of all user communications on social-networking sites including Facebook, MySpace, and Bebo.

Home Office security minister Vernon Coaker said on Monday that the EU Data Retention Directive, under which ISPs must store communications data for 12 months, does not go far enough. Communications such as those on social networking sites and instant messaging could also be monitored, he said.

“Social-networking sites, such as MySpace or Bebo, are not covered by the directive,” said Coaker, speaking at a meeting of the House of Commons Fourth Delegated Legislation Committee. “That is one reason why the government are looking at what we should do about the Intercept Modernisation Programme, because there are certain aspects of communications which are not covered by the directive.”

Under the EU Data Retention Directive, from the 15 March, 2009, all UK internet service providers (ISPs) are required to store customer traffic data for a year. The Intercept Modernisation Programme (IMP) is a government proposal, introduced last year, for legislation to use mass monitoring of traffic data as an anti-terrorism tool. The IMP has two strands: that the government use deep packet inspection to monitor the web communications of all UK citizens; and that all of the traffic data relating to those communications are stored in a centralised government database.

The UK government has previously said that communications interception was “vital”, and has hinted that social-networking sites may be put under surveillance. However, responding to a question from Liberal Democrat MP Tom Brake, Coaker said that all traffic data on social-networking sites and through instant messaging may be harvested and stored.

“The honourable member for Carshalton and Wallington will also know the controversy that currently surrounds the Intercept Modernisation Programme,” said Coaker. “I look forward to his support when we present Intercept Modernisation Programme proposals, which may include requiring the retention of data on Facebook, Bebo, MySpace and all other similar sites.”

Deep packet inspection, the second strand of the IMP, involves intercepting and examining the contents of all data packets that flow over a network. In Monday’s meeting, Coaker said the government still intends to have a consultation on whether to inspect and then store all internet traffic data in a centralised government database.

“What is the point of having a consultation if, as the honourable gentleman implies, the government have already made up their mind to have a central database?” said Coaker. “We have not made up our mind. We have said we will consult on a variety of options.”

Opposition to the government’s IMP proposal has been fierce. Cambridge University computer security expert Richard Clayton told ZDNet UK on Wednesday that the government proposal to monitor social-networking traffic was “extremely intrusive”.

“The question is whether it’s necessary or proportionate, and the short answer is no, it doesn’t look that way,” said Clayton. “If the government wants to make us safer, having a few more police on the electronic beat would be a good idea.”

Clayton said that the problem for the government is that the Data Retention Directive only applies to data held by internet service providers, but that a large number of people don’t use ISPs’ systems to communicate, instead using online services including webmail and social-networking sites. Servers may be located in different jurisdictions, said Clayton, and data-retention times may be short.

“The government wants to collect all of this data on everybody, just in case,” said Clayton. “Suppose you use hotmail.pk, and you blow up the Houses of Parliament. The government would have to persuade the Pakistani authorities to turn over the logs, which may then turn out only to have been retained for three days.”

However, Clayton believes that the cost of harvesting this information, which would involve all UK internet infrastructure providers and ISPs having ‘black boxes’ to monitor data, would be prohibitively expensive. Clayton said that taxpayers’ money would be better spent on the police, who could target investigations to those they suspect of criminal activity, rather than on performing blanket surveillance of everybody.

“To deploy deep packet inspection equipment isn’t cheap — the word ‘billion’ is appropriate,” said Clayton. “It took the Home Office the best part of a year to find £3m for the Police e-Crime Unit. That’s what is wrong with this picture.”

Web inventor Sir Tim Berners-Lee also opposes the use of deep packet inspection to inspect people’s data. Berners-Lee told ZDNet UK last week that the internet should not be “snooped” upon.

“If [third parties] are using the data for political ends or commercial interest, there we have to draw the line,” Berners-Lee said. “There’s a gap between running a successful internet service and looking inside data packets.”

Story URL: http://news.zdnet.co.uk/security/0,1000000189,39629479,00.htm

Copyright © 1995-2009 CNET Networks, Inc. All rights reserved
ZDNET is a registered service mark of CNET Networks, Inc. ZDNET Logo is a service mark of CNET Networks, Inc.

A friend of mine posted this comment on his profile today and I just had to share it. It made me laugh so hard that the back of my neck hurts and I am in tears.

Patrick says: Light travells faster than the speed of sound. This is why some people apprear bight until u hear them speak.

Now be honest, can’t you relate to the honesty and truth in that statement?

I sure can.

Thanks Patrick, you’ve made my day.

~Brett A. Scudder~